Thesis Protocol
This page provides a basic overview of the expectations and assessment criteria for a thesis in the Leiden University BA program in Koreastudies. For complete information, please download the full document.
Download: Complete Thesis Protocol (PDF)
Thesis Objectives
The BA thesis is the capstone project in the program. It aims to enable students to:
- Use up-to-date research methodologies relevant to Korean Studies
- Engage with complex academic discussions related to Korean Studies
- Articulate research findings in scholarly English
- Manage research projects within given deadlines
Assessment Criteria
The thesis is assessed according to four criteria:
| Criterion | Thesis Section(s) | Components |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge and insight | Introduction, Literature Review | Research question, motivation, literature review |
| Application of knowledge | Analytical Framework, Findings | Data, methods, analysis |
| Reaching conclusions | Conclusion & Discussion | Synthesis, contribution, limitations |
| Communication | Entire thesis | Writing, structure, citations |
Thesis Expectations
Knowledge and Insight
The research question should reflect insight into key discussions and methods of the field. The literature review should critically assess existing research and demonstrate originality.
Application of Knowledge
Expectations include critical analysis of primary sources, effective research methods, and clear justification of the adopted methodology.
Reaching Conclusions
Conclusions should be logical and well-founded, with empirical analysis playing a crucial role. Connect results to existing and future research.
Communication
Language should be competent in readability, style, spelling, grammar, and terminology. Structure should be clear with proper citations.
Example Structure
I. Introduction
- Research question
- Research problem, gap, and motivation
- Proposed research plan
- Thesis roadmap
II. Literature Review
- LR section I, II, … n
III. Analytical Framework
- Design, data, and methods
- Methodological concerns and scope
IV. Empirical Findings
- Outcome I, II, … n
V. Conclusion and Discussion
- Summary of research and findings
- Research contributions
- Limitations and alternative explanations
- Future research
VI. Bibliography
VII. Appendices
Grade Descriptors
| Grade | Level | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9-10 | Distinction | Outstanding; excellent understanding; original thinking; rigorous argument |
| 8-8.9 | Merit | Excellent understanding; independent thought; strong argument |
| 7-7.9 | Merit | Good to very good; most criteria met |
| 6-6.9 | Pass | Satisfactory understanding; reasonable argument; minor shortcomings |
| 3-5.0 | Fail | Inadequate understanding; substantial omissions |
| 0-2.9 | Fail/Ungradable | No significant grasp; irrelevant or plagiarized |
Plagiarism
Plagiarism involves presenting another’s work as your own. This includes using quotations without citations or appropriating work without acknowledgment. Internet sources are subject to the same citation standards.
See the Regulations on Plagiarism of Leiden University.
Use of Generative AI
The use of generative AI (GenAI) tools in academic work must comply with faculty policy. Students are expected to familiarize themselves with the Guidelines for the Use of GenAI in Assessment established by the Faculty of Humanities. If you use GenAI tools in any part of your research or writing, you must disclose this use in accordance with faculty guidelines. Consult with your thesis supervisor if you have questions.